I didn't say "if any Jewish person tells a non-Jewish person something is antisemitic that it automatically is." I said it's not the responsibility, nor is it appropriate for a non-Jewish person to "inform" a Jewish person as to whether or not their experience of antisemitic is real or not. The perceptions of what is or isn't antisemitic is not the same across all Jews, ever. Which is why it's more appropriate for Jews to have those kinds of conversations with other Jews; sure, if there's a consensual conversation happening about the issue between a Jew and a non-Jew about the conflict and there's a genuine, respectful argument made that is construed by a Jewish person for some reason or another as antisemitic, a respectful and logical explanation can be offered as to why it wasn't intended to be that way. But if someone is reaching out to Jews and proactively engaging them in conversations they may or may not want to have, even if they're being "oversensitive" or you don't agree with their conceptions of what is or isn't antisemitic, there is not a productive conversation to be had in the context of merely goysplaining to a Jew why they shouldn't be so oversensitive about what constitutes antisemitism. Even if they're dogmatic and being objectively dumb. It's not productive. Does this make sense? Thanks for reading and replying.