First of all, I'd like to applaud you on your rape apologism -- "I won't defend [rape]... However..." - that's really the essence of your comment.
This article was not about a vast historical timeline of Israel and the conflict-- it was about how rape is not a tool of war. But you need to go hunting down reasons why you enjoy the rape that happened and call it a fool's selective timeline of antisemite history (but really, "why Jamie may have raped a Jewish woman or child and found it justifiable"). Congratulations.
The sentence you derived this highlight and comment from, again, in the context of RAPE (not that you mind rape), is not something that has been done by Israel. This is an article about sexual violence against women and children. Of which you are, again, an apologist. No whataboutism is needed here to "contextualize" rape; make no mistake, you are not an advocate or a reasonable peacemaker -- you are an explainer and justifier of rape. Does it ruffle your feathers for me to singularly condemn rape because you are you also a rapist? Don't answer that ;)
Anyway, your ahistorical timeline needs some revising.
"Irgun and Stern Gang Zionist terrorist groups PRIOR TO ISRAEL BEING FORMED" - so you agree, the *state* of Israel (as opposed to a small extremist wing of political Zionists that started decades before Israel's inception and had mostly focused their violence against British people, not Arabs -- NOT an elected body representing the entire Jewish people or country) did not do anything of this kind.
It's tragic what happened at Deir Yassin, but hopefully you can delight in knowing that four days after the reports from Deir Yassin were published, an Arab force ambushed a Jewish convoy on the way to Hadassah Hospital, killing 77 Jews, including doctors, nurses, patients, and the director of the hospital. Another 23 people were injured.
Interesting that your revisionist history conveniently left out the Safed massacre in the 1920s (where Jews were RAPED and murdered, does that make you happy?), the Hebron massacre in 1929 (more raped Jews for you), hundreds of Jews massacred between 1936-39 (and Arab revolts ensured no safe passage for Jews attempting to escape the Holocaust), and so on.
Even the Nakba, of which I have no doubt you possess a singular narrative, was complicated. Aside from the fact that a similar "Nakba" happened to Jews at the hands of the Arab conquest of the 7th century (forcing most of us into the diaspora and condemning all who remained to horrific dhimmi status and persecution until 1948), many Palestinians left on their own accord, with the assurance that they would be able to return and gain the land in full once the Arabs destroyed the Jewish country that had literally (and I mean LITERALLY) just been created.
A coalition of Arab nations began the Arab-Israeli war with the confident assumption they would be able to annihilate the Jewish people.
Not all Palestinians took the bait, either. Many who remained became among the 2 million Arabs that comprise over 20% of Israel's population today (with full rights! Representation in the parliament! And they're not even required to do military service).
Your piteous need to "both sides" rape is a testament to your character as both a rape apologist and an antisemite (what's the difference these days?). Next time you feel compelled to chime in with selective bites of history, maybe don't-- you aren't as clever as you think you are.
